They might as well have said: "Congratulations, it's an Arian. Apparently Eugenics is alive and well - but I'm not going to fry too much on that enchilada today.
What I've been thinking lately about is the irony behind all of this. I would bet dollars to pesos that most sperm donors are not married men... After all I'm thinking most married couples would have a problem with one spouse donating to the local spermatoza bank. Maybe they get married later on in life, but I'm willing to bet they probably don't have many children if any at all. That means the gene pool we are dealing with here is made up of males that would not normally have the opportunity to procreate and pass on their genes. So I'm not thinking that natural evolution would have kept these genes in circulation for long.
What if we are creating an artificial evolution? What I mean is, what if brown eyed people, are, for whatever reason, more apt to procreate, but because of this new uptopian designer children they are wiped off the face of the planet. Where will the race head? Will we go? And what happens if the choices we make are based on our own suppositions on the ideal human being when in reality it could be some ugly fat idiot that is meant to be the future of the human race?
What makes anyone think that perfection neccessarily is to be buff, skinny, and smart? Who knows what this crazy universe has in store for us. So the next time you look a married couple ask yourself this question: would they make it on the cover Forbes? So what's perfection anyway then?
Tip o' the hat to NealeNews.
No comments:
Post a Comment